Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B p taylor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Daniel.Bryant 10:29, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Something rather strange is going on with this one. The article starts out and ends about B p taylor, who fails WP:BIO, but contains large chunks of info from the Hugh Jackman article. Very strange. Either way, Article creator appears to have made an honest mistake with the Hugh Jackman business, but the remaining issues still stand. B p taylor fails WP:BIO, no assertions of notability, no verifiable information provided (the "masterpiece" entitled "god and the milenium" gets no hits, nor does "god and the millenium". riana_dzasta 12:48, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete and should be so tagged. This is a vandalism/hoax page about a non-existent person, using large chunks of text moved from the article on Hugh Jackman.--Anthony.bradbury 12:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree - I'll wait for one more opinion though, just in case! riana_dzasta 12:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The author has modified the article, and I would accept that this person exists. But is not notable. Works quoted are not verifiable--Anthony.bradbury 15:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as hoax vandalism.Targetted Google search finds zero results [1] (I also checked under the misspelled name of the "masterpiece" as well, which incidentally also doesn't exist)--Fuhghettaboutit 13:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Change to Delete Given changes by editor, the inclusion of vast amounts of text from the Hugh Jackman may have simply been a mistake. Nevertheless, it stands that the the work the subject is claimed to have appeared in, God and the Milenium (Millenium) Crisis cannot be verified. The novel The Tower is not found through worldcat [2] and the publisher listed in the article is pretty clearly a vanity press [3]. Finally, the only Google results for Summa Cabaret, claimed to be established by the subject, are to the Wikipedia article [4] posted by this same editor [5]. Appears to be nothing here meeting WP:BIO and likely a conflict of interest exists.--Fuhghettaboutit 13:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.